Debunking Common Myths About C++ in Embedded Systems -Part1

Embedded systems are the invisible workhorses behind many of the technologies we interact with daily. These systems range from the microcontrollers in your household appliances to the sophisticated processors in your smartphone. While the C programming language has traditionally been the go-to choice for embedded development, C++ has been gaining momentum in recent years. This blog aims to dispel common myths surrounding the use of C++ in embedded systems and shed light on its real-world advantages.

Myth #1: C++ is Slow

One of the most pervasive myths about C++ in embedded systems is that it’s inherently slower than C. This belief stems from misconceptions about C++ features, like object-oriented programming, adding overhead. In reality, well-optimized C++ code can perform just as efficiently as equivalent C code.

C++ allows developers to write high-level, abstract code without sacrificing performance. By utilizing features like inline functions and efficient use of object-oriented principles, C++ can match C in terms of speed.

Myth #2: C++ Produces Bloated Machine Code

Another common misconception is that C++ generates bloated machine code. This myth is rooted in outdated notions of C++ compilers and their inefficiencies. Modern C++ compilers are highly optimized, producing lean machine code that minimally impacts code size.

While there may be some increase in code size due to C++ features, it’s generally negligible. In fact, some features like inline functions can even lead to smaller code by reducing function call overhead. When using C++ thoughtfully, there’s no need to worry about code bloat.

Myth #3: Objects Are Large

Embedded systems often work with limited memory and storage resources. Some developers mistakenly believe that C++ objects are inherently large, making them unsuitable for resource-constrained environments. However, the size of C++ objects depends on their data members and the use of features like inheritance. By designing classes thoughtfully and avoiding unnecessary overhead, C++ objects can be just as memory-efficient as their C counterparts.

Myth #4: Virtual Functions are Slow

Virtual functions, a fundamental feature of C++ for achieving polymorphism and object-oriented design, are often perceived as slow. It’s true that they introduce a small overhead due to the vtable, which manages virtual function dispatch. However, this overhead is typically minimal and outweighed by the benefits of code organization and maintainability.

In many cases, virtual functions are not a significant performance bottleneck, and their use can lead to more robust and maintainable code.

Myth #5: C++ Isn’t ROMable

Embedded systems sometimes require code to reside in ROM (Read-Only Memory) for various reasons, including security and reliability. Some developers worry that C++ code cannot be efficiently stored in ROM. However, with a compatible compiler and proper linker configuration, C++ code can indeed be ROMable.

C++ compilers offer features and optimizations to support the storage of code in ROM. By understanding how to configure your toolchain and make use of these features, you can effectively store C++ code in ROM.

Myth #6: Class Libraries Make Large Binaries

The use of class libraries in C++ can be a double-edged sword. While they provide powerful abstractions and ready-made functionality, some developers fear that including class libraries in their projects will lead to excessively large binaries. This fear is often unfounded.

The size of the binary depends on which parts of the library are used. By selectively including only the necessary components and optimizing the code, you can keep the binary size in check. C++ class libraries can be used effectively without bloating the final executable if used judiciously.

Myth #7: Abstraction Leads to Inefficiency

Embedded systems require efficiency, and some developers worry that abstraction through object-oriented design in C++ may compromise this efficiency. However, well-designed object-oriented code can be as efficient as code written in a procedural style.

Abstraction through object-oriented design simplifies code organization and improves maintainability. When implemented correctly, it doesn’t have to compromise efficiency. Careful consideration of design choices and an understanding of the underlying code generation process can ensure that abstraction enhances, rather than hinders, your embedded systems projects.

In conclusion, many of the prevalent myths about C++ in embedded systems are far from reality. When we delve into the details of C++ code generation, it becomes evident that these myths are largely unfounded. In our upcoming blog, we will explore and debunk these myths further. Till then, keep coding, keep learning, and keep innovating!

👉 Will AI take embedded software engineer’s jobs? 👈